Lower hepatotoxicity risk in Xelaglifam, a novel GPR40 agonist, compared to Fasiglifam for type 2 diabetes therapyopen access
- Authors
- Yoon, Jongmin; Song, Haengjin; Park, Ji Soo; Kim, Jeong Ho; Jun, Yearin; Gim, Sang-Ah; Hong, Changhee; An, Kyung Mi; Park, Joon-Tae; Lee, Jung Woo; Yoon, Hongchul; Kim, Yun Seok; Kim, Sang Geon
- Issue Date
- Dec-2024
- Publisher
- Elsevier Masson SAS
- Keywords
- Diabetes; DILI; Fasiglifam; GPR40 Agonist; Xelaglifam
- Citation
- Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, v.181, pp 1 - 14
- Pages
- 14
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy
- Volume
- 181
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 14
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/56324
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117674
- ISSN
- 0753-3322
1950-6007
- Abstract
- Fasiglifam, a candidate targeting GPR40, showed efficacy in clinical trials for type 2 diabetes but exerted liver toxicity. This study investigated the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk of Xelaglifam, a new GPR40 agonist, based on the potential toxicity mechanism of Fasiglifam; transporter inhibition, mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive metabolite formation, and covalent binding to proteins. In the hepatobiliary transporter assay, Xelaglifam showed a broader safety margin (>10-fold) against bile acid transporters, suggesting its less likelihood to cause bile acids accumulation, unlike Fasiglifam (<10-fold safety margin). Moreover, Xelaglifam showed no effect on glycocholic acid accumulation at higher concentrations than the estimated Cmax in the 3D human liver model, whereas Fasiglifam affected the accumulation. In the HepaRG spheroids 3D model, the AC50 values of Xelaglifam for mitochondrial function-related parameters were higher than Fasiglifam. Unlike Fasiglifam, none of the cell parameters for Xelaglifam were below the estimated 5x Cmax. Additionally, the glucuronide metabolite of Xelaglifam was negligible (<1 % of the parent) in the Safety Testing, indicating a limited contribution to DILI. Fasiglifam activated genes related to liver disease, whereas Xelaglifam had no effect; instead, it increased FXR activity, a bile acid regulator. Notably, toxicity studies in rats and monkeys showed no adverse liver effects at higher exposure levels than the effective human blood concentration. Overall, these results support a low risk of DILI for Xelaglifam treatment and the justification for its long-term use for treating type 2 diabetes. © 2024 The Authors
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Pharmacy > Department of Pharmacy > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.