Assertive Environmental Advertising and Reactance: Differences Between South Koreans and Americans

  • Kim, Yeonshin; 
  • Baek, Tae Hyun; 
  • Yoon, Sukki; 
  • Oh, Sangdo; 
  • Choi, Yung Kyun
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

73
Citations

SCOPUS

81

초록

In three studies, the authors show that Americans and South Koreans react differently to environmental advertising campaigns featuring assertive messages that threaten autonomous freedoms. The findings uphold their hypothesis that cultural differences determine whether consumers will show reactance to assertive advertising campaigns. Study 1 demonstrates that Americans are less receptive to an assertive recycling message using imperatives such as should, must, and ought and more receptive to a nonassertive message using could, might, and worth. South Koreans do not show the reactance response. Study 2, an energy-saving campaign, conceptually replicates the findings and further shows that perceived threat to freedom mediates the effects. Study 3 uses a realistic setting (i.e., online magazine) to further support the hypothesis that cultural differences affect attitudes toward assertive messages, but adds perceived politeness as an underlying second mediator.

키워드

GENERATION-X CONSUMERS; PSYCHOLOGICAL REACTANCE; MESSAGES; SELF; CULTURE; FREEDOM; APPEALS; CHINESE; RESTORATION; CONSUMPTION
제목
Assertive Environmental Advertising and Reactance: Differences Between South Koreans and Americans
저자
Kim, Yeonshin; Baek, Tae Hyun; Yoon, Sukki; Oh, Sangdo; Choi, Yung Kyun
DOI
10.1080/00913367.2017.1361878
발행일
2017-10-02
유형
Article
저널명
Journal of Advertising
권
46
호
4
페이지
550 ~ 564