The Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0open access
- Authors
- Ryu Hyo Seon; Kim Hyun Jung; Kang Dong Hyun; Kwak Yoo-Kang; Kwak Han Deok; Kwon Yoon-Hye; Kim Dalyong; Kim Baek-Hui; Kim Jae Hyun; Kim Ji Hun; Kim Jin Won; Kim Tae Hyung; Kim Hae Young; Nam Soo Min; Noh Gyoung Tae; Bong Jun Woo; Sung Nak Song; Shin Seon Hui; Lee Kil-yong; Lee Sungchul; Lee Sea-Won; Lee Jung Won; Lee Jong Min; Ihn Myung Hoon; Lim Joo Han; Ji Woong Bae; Pyo Dae Hee; Hong Young Ki; Kwak Jung-Myun
- Issue Date
- Feb-2026
- Publisher
- 대한대장항문학회
- Keywords
- Rectal neoplasms; Diagnosis; Neoadjuvant therapy; Surgery; Clinical practice guidelines
- Citation
- Annals of Coloproctology, v.42, no.1, pp 4 - 33
- Pages
- 30
- Indexed
- ESCI
KCI
- Journal Title
- Annals of Coloproctology
- Volume
- 42
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 4
- End Page
- 33
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/63892
- DOI
- 10.3393/ac.2025.01396.0199
- ISSN
- 2287-9714
2287-9722
- Abstract
- Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.