Study Protocol of a Korean Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making Model for Management of Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial (K-SDM-KOA)open access
- Authors
- Choi Byung Sun; Seo Sujin; Chang Moon Jong; Kim Joong Il; Kim Seong Hwan; Lee Do Weon; Ro Du Hyun; Choi Hyoseon; Han Hyuk-Soo
- Issue Date
- Jan-2026
- Publisher
- 대한의학회
- Keywords
- Shared Decision Making; Study Protocol; Knee Osteoarthritis; Patient-Centered Care; Pragmatic Trial
- Citation
- Journal of Korean Medical Science, v.41, no.4, pp 1 - 9
- Pages
- 9
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- Journal of Korean Medical Science
- Volume
- 41
- Number
- 4
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 9
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/63820
- DOI
- 10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e40
- ISSN
- 1011-8934
1598-6357
- Abstract
- Severe knee osteoarthritis (KOA) involves complex, preference-sensitive treatment decisions, ranging from non-operative to surgical options. However, despite the preference-sensitive nature of KOA, existing shared decision-making (SDM) processes often lack clarity in effectively incorporating patients’ values and preferences into treatment decisions.
Moreover, most SDM models have been developed in western contexts, which may limit their applicability in other cultural settings. To address these limitations, a Korean Shared Decision-Making Model for KOA (K-SDM-KOA) has been developed using a culturally adapted, five-step framework that integrates a web-based decision-support platform and age-friendly educational media. The K-SDM-KOA model is designed to support preferencesensitive decision-making through a pragmatic, multicenter cohort framework involving 1,300 patients with Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3–4 across five hospitals. Within this framework, patients receive either standard care or the K-SDM-KOA intervention, which combines pre-consultation preparation (step 1–3) with in-clinic deliberation and decisionmaking (step 4–5). The primary outcome is patient-perceived SDM measured using the Korean-validated 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire, reported on a 0–100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater SDM. Secondary outcomes include patients’ preferred role in decision-making, decisional conflict, decision regret, and knowledge gain related to KOA. Additionally, a nested cohort of 50 patients undergoing contralateral total knee arthroplasty will provide paired analyses of early pain and function (visual analogue scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score) at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat principle and employ linear mixed-effect models and appropriate statistical tests to assess between group differences. This article presents a culturally tailored, technology-supported SDM model designed to enhance decision quality and early patient-reported outcomes in severe KOA. Findings may provide a foundation for future empirical studies and support the broader adoption of structured SDM in Korea’s healthcare system.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.