Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Study Protocol of a Korean Patient-Centered Shared Decision-Making Model for Management of Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial (K-SDM-KOA)open access

Authors
Choi Byung SunSeo SujinChang Moon JongKim Joong IlKim Seong HwanLee Do WeonRo Du HyunChoi HyoseonHan Hyuk-Soo
Issue Date
Jan-2026
Publisher
대한의학회
Keywords
Shared Decision Making; Study Protocol; Knee Osteoarthritis; Patient-Centered Care; Pragmatic Trial
Citation
Journal of Korean Medical Science, v.41, no.4, pp 1 - 9
Pages
9
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Volume
41
Number
4
Start Page
1
End Page
9
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/63820
DOI
10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e40
ISSN
1011-8934
1598-6357
Abstract
Severe knee osteoarthritis (KOA) involves complex, preference-sensitive treatment decisions, ranging from non-operative to surgical options. However, despite the preference-sensitive nature of KOA, existing shared decision-making (SDM) processes often lack clarity in effectively incorporating patients’ values and preferences into treatment decisions. Moreover, most SDM models have been developed in western contexts, which may limit their applicability in other cultural settings. To address these limitations, a Korean Shared Decision-Making Model for KOA (K-SDM-KOA) has been developed using a culturally adapted, five-step framework that integrates a web-based decision-support platform and age-friendly educational media. The K-SDM-KOA model is designed to support preferencesensitive decision-making through a pragmatic, multicenter cohort framework involving 1,300 patients with Kellgren–Lawrence grade 3–4 across five hospitals. Within this framework, patients receive either standard care or the K-SDM-KOA intervention, which combines pre-consultation preparation (step 1–3) with in-clinic deliberation and decisionmaking (step 4–5). The primary outcome is patient-perceived SDM measured using the Korean-validated 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire, reported on a 0–100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater SDM. Secondary outcomes include patients’ preferred role in decision-making, decisional conflict, decision regret, and knowledge gain related to KOA. Additionally, a nested cohort of 50 patients undergoing contralateral total knee arthroplasty will provide paired analyses of early pain and function (visual analogue scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Knee Society Score) at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat principle and employ linear mixed-effect models and appropriate statistical tests to assess between group differences. This article presents a culturally tailored, technology-supported SDM model designed to enhance decision quality and early patient-reported outcomes in severe KOA. Findings may provide a foundation for future empirical studies and support the broader adoption of structured SDM in Korea’s healthcare system.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Lee, Do Weon photo

Lee, Do Weon
Graduate School (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE