Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Off-label underdosing of edoxaban antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: findings from the EPIC-CAD trial

Authors
Cho, Min SooKang, Do-YoonLee, Jung-BokOh, Yong-SeogLee, Chang HoonChoi, Eue-KeunLee, Ji HyunKwon, Chang HeePark, Gyung-MinChoi, Hyung OhPark, Kyoung-HaPark, Kyoung-MinHwang, JongminYoo, Ki-DongCho, Young RakKim, Ji-HyunHwang, Ki WonJin, Eun SunKwon, OsungKim, Ki-HunPark, Duk-WooNam, Gi-Byoung
Issue Date
Sep-2025
Publisher
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
Keywords
Atrial Fibrillation; Coronary artery disease
Citation
Heart
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Heart
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/61607
DOI
10.1136/heartjnl-2025-326646
ISSN
1355-6037
1468-201X
Abstract
Objective The impact of off-label underdosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Methods The EPIC-CAD trial (Edoxaban vs Edoxaban with antiPlatelet agent In patients with atrial fibrillation and Chronic stable Coronary Artery Disease) randomised patients with AF and stable CAD to receive either edoxaban monotherapy or dual antithrombotic therapy (edoxaban plus single antiplatelet agent). Off-label underdosing was defined as low-dose edoxaban (30 mg once daily) without standard criteria for dose reduction. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, unplanned revascularisation and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding at 12 months. Results Among the 1040 randomised patients, 694 patients (66.7%) without dose-reduction criteria were included; of whom, 121 patients (17.4%) received edoxaban underdosing. At 12 months, the incidence of primary outcome was similar between standard-dose and under-dose edoxaban groups (10.5% vs 9.2%, adjusted HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.54). There was no significant difference in major ischaemic events (1.4% vs 1.7%, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.22 to 5.91) and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (9.0% vs 8.4%, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.78). Regardless of edoxaban underdosing, edoxaban monotherapy was associated with lower risk of primary net-clinical outcomes and bleeding compared with dual antithrombotic therapy. Conclusions In patients with AF and stable CAD, there was no significant difference in the rate of primary outcome between off-label underdose and standard-dose edoxaban. The benefit of edoxaban monotherapy over dual antithrombotic therapy was consistent regardless of edoxaban underdosing. However, given the analyses were underpowered and the CI was wide, the results cannot be considered clinically directive. Trial registration number URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifiers: NCT03718559.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE