Detailed Information

Cited 20 time in webofscience Cited 23 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Metaopen access

Authors
Ko, Min JungPark, Dong A.Kim, Sung HyunKo, Eun SookShin, Kyung HwanLim, WoosungKwak, Beom SeokChang, Jung Min
Issue Date
Aug-2021
Publisher
KOREAN RADIOLOGICAL SOC
Keywords
Breast cancer; Manmmography  Breast tomosynthesis; Meta-analysis; Performance
Citation
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, v.22, no.8, pp 1240 - 1252
Pages
13
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume
22
Number
8
Start Page
1240
End Page
1252
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/4700
DOI
10.3348/kjr.2020.1227
ISSN
1229-6929
2005-8330
Abstract
Objective: To compare the accuracy for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting between the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), defined as DBT alone or combined DBT and digital mammography (DM), and the use of DM alone through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library and five Korean local databases were searched for articles published until March 25, 2020. We selected studies that reported diagnostic accuracy in women who were recalled after screening or symptomatic. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. We compared the diagnostic accuracy between DBT and DM alone using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by modality of intervention, country, existence of calcifications, breast density, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category threshold, study design, protocol for participant sampling, sample size, reason for diagnostic examination, and number of readers who interpreted the studies. Results: Twenty studies (n = 44513) that compared DBT and DM alone were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.94), respectively, for DBT, which were higher than 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.83) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.89), respectively, for DM alone (p < 0.001). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97) for DBT and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82-0.88) for DM alone. The higher sensitivity and specificity of DBT than DM alone were consistently noted in most subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Conclusion: Use of DBT was more accurate than DM alone for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Women with clinical symptoms or abnormal screening findings could be more effectively evaluated for breast cancer using DBT, which has a superior diagnostic to DM alone.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kwak, Beom Seok photo

Kwak, Beom Seok
Graduate School (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE