국가노출감시체계 구축을 위한 작업환경측정과 특수건강진단 자료의 노출 정보 입력 실태 평가Evaluation of the Input Status of Exposure-related Information of Working Environment Monitoring Database and Special Health Examination Database for the Construction of a National Exposure Surveillance System
- Other Titles
- Evaluation of the Input Status of Exposure-related Information of Working Environment Monitoring Database and Special Health Examination Database for the Construction of a National Exposure Surveillance System
- Authors
- 최상준; 고동희; 박주현; 박동욱; 김환철; 임대성; 성예지; 고경윤; 임지선; 서회경
- Issue Date
- Sep-2022
- Publisher
- 한국산업보건학회
- Keywords
- National surveillance system; standardization; special health examination data; work environment monitoring data
- Citation
- 한국산업보건학회지, v.32, no.3, pp 231 - 241
- Pages
- 11
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 한국산업보건학회지
- Volume
- 32
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 231
- End Page
- 241
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/2587
- DOI
- 10.15269/JKSOEH.2022.32.3.231
- ISSN
- 2384-132X
2289-0564
- Abstract
- Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the input status of exposure-related information in the working environment monitoring database (WEMD) and special health examination database (SHED) for the construction of a national exposure surveillance system.
Methods: The industrial and process code input status of WEMD and SHED for 21 carcinogens from 2014 to 2016 was compared. Data from workers who performed both work environment monitoring and special health examinations in 2019 and 2020 were extracted and the actual status of input of industrial and process codes was analyzed. We also investigated the cause of input errors through a focus group interview with 12 data input specialists.
Results: As a result of analyzing WMED and SHED for 21 carcinogens, the five-digit industrial code matching rate was low at 53.5% and the process code matching rate was 19% or less. Among the data that simultaneously conducted work environment monitoring and special health examination in 2019 and 2020, the process code matching rate was very low at 18.1% and 5.2%, respectively. The main causes of exposurerelated data input errors were the difference between the WEMD and SHED process code input systems from 2020, the number of standard process and job codes being too large, and the inefficiency of the standard code search system.
Conclusions: In order to use WEMD and SHED as a national surveillance system, it is necessary to simplify the number of standard code input codes and improve the search system efficiency.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Natural Science > Department of Statistics > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.