Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

원전 사고와 원전체제의 변화: TMI와 체르노빌 사고를 중심으로Nuclear Plant Accident and Change of the Nuclear Power Regime: Cases of the Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl Accidents

Other Titles
Nuclear Plant Accident and Change of the Nuclear Power Regime: Cases of the Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl Accidents
Authors
김덕호박진희이내주이정희
Issue Date
Nov-2016
Publisher
한국서양사연구회
Keywords
스리마일 아일랜드 원전사고; 체르노빌 원전사고; 원전체제; 여론; 안전.; TMI accident; Chernobyl accident; nuclear power regime; public opinion; safety.
Citation
서양사연구, no.55, pp 83 - 120
Pages
38
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
서양사연구
Number
55
Start Page
83
End Page
120
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/24199
DOI
10.16894/JOWH.55.3
ISSN
1738-7027
2733-953X
Abstract
This article will try to show the major nuclear plant accidents such as the Three Mile Island[TMI] accident in the US, and the Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union. It will focus not on their causes and processes but on the effects on the public opinion and the nuclear power regimes among the UK, France, West Germany, and the US. It will investigate on how the public opinion had formulated, and how the nuclear power regimes had responded to these accidents among these 4 countries in a comparative history. It will show the diverse responses of each state’s nuclear power regime from the post-nuclear plant policy to the reinforcement of the existing nuclear plant policy, even though these nuclear plant accidents had affected enormously on their societies. The TMI accident in 1979 was perceived as a great shock to most Americans. Despite its scale was so disastrous that the anti-nuclear movement had risen nationwide, the American nuclear power regime did not give up the pro-nuclear plant policy. Furthermore, its impacts on the European countries including the UK, France, and West Germany were relatively not so strong, although these countries took steps in enforcing the safety problems of the nuclear plants. However, the Chernobyl accident case in 1986 was different to the European states because it was the worst nuclear plant accident and they were interconnected as a whole, no countries escaped from the radioactive fallout. Despite of this fact, the responses of each states were so different. As a result, while the UK had to accept to the people’s voices asking for the reexamination of safety on the nuclear plants, the US had still continued the nuclear power regime in the federal level, while some state governments – New York, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts – raised doubts about the operations of nuclear plants. More dramatic contrast happened between West Germany and France. While West Germany finally decided to build no more nuclear plant for a post-nuclear society, France opened most information on the nuclear plants and had got a support from the majority of French people. Through implementing a policy of “embrace and extend” against the anti-nuclear power, the French government had succeeded in making its nuclear power regime more positively.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Dharma College > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Jin Hee photo

Park, Jin Hee
Dharma College
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE