Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Monitoring Porcine Cytomegalovirus in Both Donors and Recipients is Crucial for Recipient's Survival in Pig-to-Cynomolgus Xenotransplantation

Authors
Kwon, O KyungJeong, Eun SungLee, Kyo WonChoi, Mi RanSonn, Chung HeeCho, BumraeShim, JoohyunChoi, KimyungKim, Sung JooPark, Jae Berm
Issue Date
Apr-2024
Publisher
Appleton & Lange
Keywords
Animal Experiment; Animal Model; Article; Blood Analysis; Clinical Protocol; Correlational Study; Cytomegalovirus Infection; Dna Extraction; Donor; Kidney Transplantation; Macaca Fascicularis; Male; Nonhuman; Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell; Phenotype; Pig; Postoperative Period; Preoperative Period; Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; Survival; Survival Time; Transgenic Pig; Virus Examination; Xenotransplantation; Animal; Cytomegalovirus; Genetics; Graft Survival; Mortality; Transgenic Animal; Virology; Xenograft; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Graft Survival; Kidney Transplantation; Swine; Tissue Donors; Transplantation, Heterologous
Citation
Transplantation Proceedings, v.56, no.3, pp 686 - 691
Pages
6
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Transplantation Proceedings
Volume
56
Number
3
Start Page
686
End Page
691
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/22772
DOI
10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.01.028
ISSN
0041-1345
1873-2623
Abstract
Background: Xenotransplantation, particularly when involving pig donors, presents challenges related to the transmission of porcine cytomegalovirus (pCMV) and its potential impact on recipient outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pCMV positivity in both donors and recipients and the survival time of cynomolgus monkey recipients after xenogeneic kidney transplantation. Methods: We conducted 20 cynomolgus xenotransplants using 18 transgenic pigs. On the surgery day, donor pig blood was sampled, and DNA was extracted from serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Recipient DNA extraction followed the same protocol from pre-transplantation to post-transplantation. Porcine cytomegalovirus detection used real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) with the ViroReal kit, achieving a sensitivity of 50 copies/reaction. A Ct value of 37.0 was the pCMV positivity threshold. Results: Of 20 cynomolgus recipients, when donors tested negative for pCMV, recipients also showed negative results in 9 cases. In 4 cases where donors were negative, recipients tested positive. All 5 cases with pCMV-positive donors resulted in positive assessments for recipients. Detection of donor pCMV correlated with shorter recipient survival. Continuous recipient positivity during observation correlated with shorter survival, whereas transient detection showed no significant change in survival rates. However, donor pig phenotypes and transplantation protocols did not significantly impact survival. Conclusion: The detection of pCMV in both donors and recipients plays a crucial role in xenotransplantation outcomes. These findings suggest the importance of monitoring and managing pCMV in xenotransplantation to enhance long-term outcomes. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE