Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Impact of Sedation on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Adverse Events after Surveillance Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Studyopen access

Authors
Kim, Sang YoonLee, Jun KyuLee, Kwang HyuckJang, Jae-YoungKim, Byung-Wook
Issue Date
Mar-2024
Publisher
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Keywords
Adverse events; Stomach neoplasms; Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; Sedatives
Citation
Gut and Liver, v.17, no.4, pp 245 - 256
Pages
12
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Gut and Liver
Volume
17
Number
4
Start Page
245
End Page
256
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/22097
DOI
10.5009/gnl230043
ISSN
1976-2283
2005-1212
Abstract
Background/Aims: The impact of sedation on cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) adverse events after esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unclear. We investigated the incidence rate and impact of sedation on CCV adverse events after surveillance EGD in patients with GC. Methods: We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. Using a propensity score-matched analysis, patients with GC were divided into two groups: sedative agent users and nonusers for surveillance EGD. We compared the occurrence of CCV adverse events within 14 days between the two groups. Results: Of the 103,463 patients with GC, newly diagnosed CCV adverse events occurred in 2.57% of patients within 14 days after surveillance EGD. Sedative agents were used in 41.3% of the patients during EGD. The incidence rates of CCV adverse events with and without sedation were 173.6/10,000 and 315.4/10,000, respectively. Between sedative agent users and nonusers based on propensity score matching (28,008 pairs), there were no significant differences in the occurrence of 14-day CCV, cardiac, cerebral, and other vascular adverse events (2.28% vs 2.22%, p=0.69; 1.44% vs 1.31%, p=0.23; 0.74% vs 0.84%, p=0.20; 0.10% vs 0.07%, p=0.25, respectively). Conclusions: Sedation during surveillance EGD was not associated with CCV adverse events in patients with GC. Therefore, the use of sedative agents may be considered in patients with GC during surveillance EGD without excessive concerns about CCV adverse events. (Gut Liver, Published online June 15, 2023)
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE