Detailed Information

Cited 49 time in webofscience Cited 52 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of the Usefulness of the Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA2) with the Original HOMA1 in the Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Koreansopen access

Authors
Song, Young SeokHwang, You-CheolAhn, Hong-YupPark, Cheol-Young
Issue Date
Aug-2016
Publisher
KOREAN DIABETES ASSOC
Keywords
Homeostasis model assessment 1; Homeostasis model assessment 2; Insulin resistance; Insulin secretion
Citation
DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, v.40, no.4, pp 318 - 325
Pages
8
Indexed
SCOPUS
ESCI
KCI
Journal Title
DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL
Volume
40
Number
4
Start Page
318
End Page
325
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/17360
DOI
10.4093/dmj.2016.40.4.318
ISSN
2233-6079
2233-6087
Abstract
Background: The original homeostasis model assessment (HOMA1) and the updated HOMA model (HOMA2) have been used to evaluate insulin resistance (IR) and beta-cell function, but little is known about the usefulness of HOMA2 for the prediction of diabetes in Koreans. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the usefulness of HOMA2 as a predictor of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Koreans without diabetes. Methods: The study population consisted of 104,694 Koreans enrolled at a health checkup program and followed up from 2001 to 2012. Participants were divided into a normal glucose tolerance (NGT) group and a pre-diabetes group according to fasting glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin levels. Anthropometric and laboratory data were measured at the baseline checkup, and HOMA values were calculated at the baseline and follow-up checkups. The hazard ratios (HRs) of the HOMA1 and HOMA2 values and the prevalence of diabetes at follow-up were evaluated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: After adjusting for several diabetes risk factors, all of the HOMA values except 1/HOMA1-beta and 1/HOMA2-beta in the NGT group were significant predictors of the progression to diabetes. In the NGT group, there was no significant difference in HOMA1-IR (HR, 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.14) and HOMA2-IR (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.19). However, in the pre-diabetes group, 1/HOMA2-beta was a more powerful marker (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.31) than HOMA1-IR (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.28) or 1/HOMA1-beta (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.16). In the non-diabetic group (NGT+pre-diabetes), 1/HOMA2-beta was also a stronger predictor of diabetes (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.29) than HOMA1-IR (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.15) or 1/HOMA1-beta (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.14). Conclusion: HOMA2 is more predictive than HOMA1 for the progression to diabetes in pre-diabetes or non-diabetic Koreans.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Natural Science > Department of Statistics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Ahn, Hong Yup photo

Ahn, Hong Yup
College of Natural Science (Department of Statistics)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE