ScholarWorks@Dongguk University: Byun, Jong pil

Detailed Information

Byun, Jong pil (변종필)

College of Law (Department of Law)

Research Area

Tel 02-2260-3238
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

법규칙:3||법원리:2||Legal Rule:2||적법절차원칙:2||fair trial:2||Legal Principle:2||공정한 재판:2||합리적 논증:2||정당성:2||rational argumentation:2||Criminal Procedure Law Article 216 Clause 1 number 1:1||Criminal Recognition:1||Dignified Death:1||Direct Relation:1||Dismissal of Indictment:1||Due Process:1||Due Process and Method:1||Euthanasia:1||Hans Kelsen:1||Illegal Filming:1||Investigative Authority:1||Judicial Police Officer:1||Kommunikatives Verfahrensmodell:1||Legitimacy:1||Necessity:1||Nonpositivist Theory of Law:1||Obligation to Transfer a Case:1||PhysicianAssisted Suicide:1||Presidential Immunity from Prosecution:1||Principle of Clarity:1||Principle of Due Process:1||Principle of Truth:1||Proportionality:1||Prosecutor:1||Prosecutorial Authority:1||Right of Crossexamination:1||Right to Die:1||Rule Against Hearsay:1||Standard of Comprehensive Evaluation:1||Trialcenteredness Doctrine:1||Unmittelbarkeitsgrundsatz:1||Urgency:1||Warrant Requirement:1||adversary system:1||arbitrariness of lawinterpretation:1||basic norm:1||compulsory measure:1||confinement:1||conflict of principles:1||criminal procedure law:1||dualized perspective:1||due process of law:1||effectiveness:1||erlittene Untersuchungshaft im Ausland:1||ex officio principle:1||final basis of justification:1||interpretation of criminal law:1||interpretationapplication of criminal law:1||interpretative canons:1||intersubjective standards:1||involuntary admission:1||isolationcompulsion:1||justifiable act:1||justification:1||legal positivity:1||legal principle:1||legal rule:1||legitimacy:1||mental health law:1||normative evaluation standard:1||preunderstanding:1||prevention:1||principle of due process of law:1||principle of equality of arms:1||principle of legality:1||principle of statutory reservation:1||principle of written indictment only:1||prohibition of analogy:1||punishment:1||regional scope of validity of criminal law:1||restorative justice:1||restriction on social ethics:1||retrial:1||retribution:1||social ethics:1||social rule:1||socially accepted idea:1||standard of comprehensive evaluation:1||structure of criminal procedure:1||task of criminal law:1||the Special Act for 4.3. Uprising:1||validity of law:1||vollstreckte Strafe im Ausland:1||§422 Criminal Procedure Act:1||감금:1||강제입원:1||강제처분:1||검사:1||격리강박:1||공소권:1||공소기각판결:1||공소장일본주의:1||공수처:1||공판중심주의:1||규범적 평가기준:1||근본규범:1||긴급성:1||논증:1||당사자주의:1||대체증거:1||명확성원칙:1||무기대등원칙:1||반대신문권:1||법률유보원칙:1||법원칙:1||법의 효력:1||법해석의 자의성:1||불법촬영죄:1||불법촬영죄에서의 신체:1||불소추특권:1||비례성:1||비실증주의:1||사법경찰관:1||사회상규:1||사회윤리:1||사회윤리적 제한:1||사회통념:1||상호주관적 척도:1||선고형에의 산입:1||선이해:1||수사권:1||실효성:1||안락사:1||영장주의:1||영장청구권:1||예방:1||외국에서의 미결구금:1||외국에서의 형 집행:1||원칙충돌:1||유추금지원칙:1||유추적용:1||응보:1||의사소통적 소송모델:1||의사조력자살:1||이송의무:1||이원화:1||인지:1||재심개시결정:1||재심사유:1||적법절차:1||적법한 절차:1||적법한 절차와 방식:1||전문법칙:1||정당행위:1||정당화사유:1||정신보건법:1||제주 4‧3사건:1||조력자살:1||존엄사:1||종합적 판단기준:1||종합적 판단기준설:1||죄형법정원칙:1||죽을 권리:1||직권주의:1||직접 관련성:1||직접주의:1||진실규명원칙:1||최종적 정당화근거:1||필요성:1||한스 켈젠:1||합법적 실정성:1||해석카논:1||형벌:1||형법의 임무:1||형법의 장소적 효력범위:1||형법해석:1||형법해석・적용:1||형사소송구조:1||형사소송법:1||형사소송법 제216조 제1항 제1호:1||형사소송법 제422조:1||4‧3 특별법:1||회복적 정의:1||4.3 Uprising on Jeju Island in Korea:1||Analogie:1||Anrechnung auf die erkannte Strafe:1||Argumentation:1||Assisted Dying:1||Authority to Request Warrants:1||Beweissurrogate:1||Body in Illegal Filming:1||Corruption Investigation Office for Highranking Officials:1||

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea+82-2-2260-3114

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE