ScholarWorks@Dongguk University: Jo, Eun kyung

Detailed Information

Jo, Eun kyung (조은경)

College of Police and Criminal Justice (Department of Police Administration)

Research Area: 수사면담, 거짓말 탐지, 법적 판단, INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW, DECEPTION DETECTION, LEGAL DECISION MAKING

Tel 02-2260-3254
Homepage

ResearcherID ORCiD Scopus Google Scholar ID ResearchGate

Keyword

CBCA:6||statement analysis:4||deception detection:4||조서왜곡:3||보호관찰:3||진술 분석:3||distortion of paper record:3||진술 일관성:3||Probation:3||statement consistency:3||거짓말 탐지:3||FGI:2||Information gathering:2||risk assessment:2||RoBERTa:2||척도 개발:2||생략:2||기만 탐지:2||Scale development:2||자기기입식 면담:2||SelfAdministered Interview:2||Deception:2||스토킹:2||statement inconsistency:2||BERT:2||재범위험성 평가:2||Countermeasures:2||Psychopathy Checklist:2||Stalking:2||목격자 기억:2||형사사법:2||조작:2||KORASG:2||evidence assessment:2||준거기반 내용분석:2||PCLR:2||verifiability approach:2||가정폭력:2||Strategic Use of Evidence(SUE):2||commission:2||omission:2||IPV:2||진술분석:2||Criminal Justice:2||Tit for tat:2||NICHD:1||NICHD protocol:1||NICHD 면담기법:1||Natural Language Processing:1||Network Analyisis.:1||Networking:1||Offline Bullying Victims:1||PartnerOnly violence:1||Plausibility:1||Police Response:1||Presentence investigation:1||Presumption of innocence:1||Principle of Equality of Arms:1||Prisoner’s dilemma:1||Proportion of complications:1||RASA:1||Random Forest:1||Rape Myth:1||Recall Accuracy:1||Recidivism risk assessment:1||Relational Crimes:1||Risk assessment:1||Sentencing Hearing:1||Separation of Trial Procedure:1||Sexual Violence Crime:1||Sexual Violence Victim Interview:1||Sexually Aggressive Behavior:1||Statement Validity Analysis:1||Statement Validity Assessment:1||TaskOriented Dialogue System:1||Terrorism:1||Text Mining:1||Topic Modeling:1||Triple+:1||Triple+ extraction:1||VictimizationOffending Overlapping Behavior:1||Whitecollar crime:1||YouTube comment analysis:1||Youth:1||Youth Version:1||a change in statement:1||abnormal motive crime:1||avatar sexual crime:1||chatbot:1||child sexual abuse interview:1||child victim:1||comparative study:1||conceptual nature:1||correction of records:1||counterterrorism negotiation:1||countermeasures:1||credibility:1||crisis negotiation:1||criteria classification:1||crosscultural comparison:1||crossexamination:1||data augmentation:1||deception:1||defense counsel:1||detecting deception:1||detials relevance:1||evaluation about veracity:1||evidence perception:1||eyewitness memory:1||homicide offender:1||hostage negotiation:1||information gathering:1||initial memory recall:1||intent classification:1||interrater reliability:1||intermediary:1||interrogation:1||interrogation technique:1||investigative director:1||investigative interview:1||investigator’s belief:1||lie detection:1||mental disordered offender:1||military death case:1||military police:1||military suicides:1||misinformation effect:1||modifier:1||motiveless crime:1||named entity recognition:1||natural language processing:1||nonspecific motive crime:1||perception of statement consistency:1||polygraph test:1||preinterview:1||psychological autopsy:1||public    defense    attorney:1||rapport building:1||sentence length:1||sentencing guidelines:1||sexual abuse:1||statement credibility assessment:1||suicide prevention:1||suicide prevention policy:1||suicides:1||suspect:1||text mining:1||the public’s opinion:1||the strength of evidence:1||topic modeling:1||unexpected questions:1||verbal lie detection:1||강간통념:1||강압적 통제:1||개념적 실체:1||거짓 탐지:1||공판절차 이분론:1||관계성 범죄:1||교제폭력:1||국선   변호인:1||군 사망사고:1||군 자살:1||군사경찰:1||네트워크분석:1||네트워크활동:1||다문화 청소년:1||단독행위 테러범:1||대응기법:1||대중의 인식:1||대테러협상:1||라인업:1||라포 형성:1||랜덤포레스트:1||머신러닝:1||메타분석:1||목적 지향 대화 시스템:1||무기대등의 원칙:1||무동기 범죄:1||무죄추정의 원칙:1||묻지마 범죄:1||반대신문:1||반사회성:1||법적 의사결정:1||변호인:1||부정 삼각형:1||비교연구:1||비난:1||비행:1||비행이론:1||사실심리:1||사이버 공간:1||사이버 불링:1||사전면담:1||성범죄:1||성적 가해 행동:1||성폭력 피해자 조사:1||수사 면담:1||수사지휘자:1||수식어:1||식별 정확도:1||심리부검:1||심신미약   감경:1||심증:1||아동:1||아동 피해자:1||아동보호체계:1||아동학대:1||아바타 성착취:1||암묵적 연합 검사(IAT):1||암묵적 태도:1||양형:1||양형   기준:1||양형심리:1||언어적 거짓 탐지:1||예상치 못한 질문:1||오정보 효과:1||오프라인 불링 피해자:1||외로운 늑대:1||외현적 태도:1||위기협상:1||유튜브 댓글 분석:1||유형화:1||음주:1||의사결정:1||이상동기 범죄:1||이중잣대:1||인질협상:1||인터넷:1||일반화된 폭력 가해자(GV):1||자살:1||자살예방:1||자살예방정책:1||자연어 처리:1||자연어처리:1||잠재계층분석:1||재범위험성:1||전략적 증거제시 기법:1||전략적 증거제시(SUE 테크닉):1||정보의 중요도:1||정신질환   살인범:1||정신질환 범죄자:1||조서정정:1||죄수의 딜레마:1||준거 분류:1||증거 강도:1||증거 지각:1||증거 평가:1||증거평가:1||지역경찰:1||진술 변화:1||진술 불일치:1||진술 신빙성 분석:1||진술 신빙성 평가:1||진술 일관성 인식:1||진술신빙성:1||진술일관성:1||진술조력인:1||진술타당도평가:1||책임 귀인:1||책임주의:1||챗봇:1||청소년:1||초기 기억회상:1||치료명령:1||친밀한 파트너 폭력:1||테러리즘:1||텍스트 마이닝:1||텍스트마이닝:1||토픽 모델링:1||토픽모델링:1||파트너 한정 가해자(PO):1||판결전 조사:1||평가자 간 신뢰도:1||폴리그래프 검사:1||피의자:1||피의자 신문기법:1||피의자신문:1||피해가해 중첩:1||혐의평가:1||협상:1||화이트칼라 범죄:1||확인 가능한 사실 접근:1||확인 가능한 정보:1||Alcohol:1||회상 정확도:1||Antisociality:1||Attribution of Responsibility:1||Blame Judgment:1||Checkable sources:1||Child:1||Child Abuse:1||Child Protection System:1||Classification:1||Clinical experience:1||Coercive Control:1||Court order of medical treatment:1||CriteriaBased Content Analysis:1||Criteriabased Content Analysis:1||Cyberbullying:1||Cyberspace:1||Decision making:1||Delinquency:1||Delinquency Theory:1||Domestic violence:1||Double Standard:1||ESS total scores:1||ESS 총점:1||Explicit Attitude:1||Eyewitness Memory:1||FactFinding Hearing:1||Fraud triangle:1||General violence:1||Identification Accuracy:1||Implicit Association Theory:1||Implicit Attitude:1||Internet:1||Intimate Parter Violence(IPV):1||Intimate Partner Violence:1||Latent Class Analysis(LCA):1||Legal DecisionMaking:1||Lineup:1||LoneActor Terrorism:1||LoneWolf:1||Machine Learning:1||Mentally disordered offender:1||Meta Analysis:1||Model Statement:1||Model statement:1||Multicultural Adolescents:1||

RSS_1.0 RSS_2.0 ATOM_1.0

30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea+82-2-2260-3114

Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.

Detailed Information

Keyword

BROWSE