The Post-Coup Military Spending Question Revisited, 1960-2000

Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

7
Citations

SCOPUS

8

초록

Do military regimes spend more on the military than other regime types? All leaders cater to their winning coalition. For military leaders, core supporters are other members of the military. To solicit support from this group, first, leaders are persuaded to spend more on the military to ensure their political survival, while other autocratic leaders tend to view the military as a competing power center. Second, the cost of repressing challenges from the public in military regimes is cheaper than in other regimes; therefore, leaders in military regimes allocate more resources to the military to satisfy them. We test this argument by examining military spending in different regime types for 1960-2000. The empirical results from Prais-Winsten regression with panel-corrected standard errors indicate that military regimes allocate more, on average, to the military than other regimes and that military rulers brought into power through military coups or who have experienced military coup attempts against them increase their military resource allocation.

키워드

military coupmilitary regimemilitary spendingPrais-Winsten regressionUNITED-STATESDEMOCRACYPEACEDEFENSEREGIMESRULEWAR
제목
The Post-Coup Military Spending Question Revisited, 1960-2000
저자
Kim, Hong-CheolKim, Hyung MinLee, Jaechul
DOI
10.1080/03050629.2013.782305
발행일
2013-07-01
유형
Article
저널명
International Interactions
39
3
페이지
367 ~ 385