The Efficacy of Using Countermeasures in a Model Statement Interview

  • Vrij, Aldert
  • Leal, Sharon
  • Fisher, Ronald P.
  • Mann, Samantha
  • Deeb, Haneen
  • ... Jo, Eunkyung
  • 외 2명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

25
Citations

SCOPUS

26

초록

In a countermeasures experiment, we examined to what extent liars who learn about the Model Statement tool and about the proportion of complications (complications/complications + common knowledge details + self-handicapping strategies) can successfully adjust their responses so that they sound like truth tellers. Truth tellers discussed a trip they had made; liars fabricated a story. Participants were of Lebanese, Mexican, and South-Korean origin. Prior to the interview they did or did not receive information about (i) the working of the Model statement and (ii) three types of verbal detail: complications, common knowledge details and self-handicapping strategies. We found no evidence that liars sounded like truth tellers after being informed about the Model Statement and/or types of detail we examined. Actually, veracity differences were similar across experimental conditions, with truth tellers reporting more detail and more complications and obtaining a higher proportion of complications score than liars.

키워드

CountermeasuresInformation gatheringDeceptionModel statementProportion of complicationsELICIT INFORMATIONCUESDECEITDECEPTION
제목
The Efficacy of Using Countermeasures in a Model Statement Interview
저자
Vrij, AldertLeal, SharonFisher, Ronald P.Mann, SamanthaDeeb, HaneenJo, EunkyungCampos, Claudia CastroHamzeh, Samer
DOI
10.5093/ejpalc2020a3
발행일
2020
유형
Article
저널명
European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
12
1
페이지
23 ~ 34