Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses

Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses

초록

In this squib, we review two recent analyses of multiple fragmentanswers (MFA) in Korean. Ahn and Cho (2013) argue that MFAs arederived from multiple clauses, each fragment being derived from its own(sentential) source. On the other hand, Ahn (2012) suggests an extensionof Lasnik's (2007, 2013) analysis of English multiple sluicing to KoreanMFAs. Discussing their arguments in detail, we argue that these analysescannot be maintained. We show that Korean MFAs are best captured ifwe assume that MFAs are derived from a mono-clause via either ellipsisor pro/cleft, as argued by Park (2013).

키워드

multiple fragment answersellipsisRight Dislocationprocleftclause-mate conditionmultiple sluicing
제목
Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses
제목 (타언어)
Multiple Fragments Do Not Mean Multiple Clauses
저자
박범식오세랑
DOI
10.15860/sigg.24.1.201402.307
발행일
2014-02
저널명
생성문법연구
24
1
페이지
307 ~ 323