Cited 0 time in
基于中韩副词种类及句法位置对比的语序偏误探讨
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 유준방 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 한용수 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-28T04:41:34Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-28T04:41:34Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2019-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1226-4555 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2765-4060 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/8228 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The most conspicuous different word order between Chinese and Korean is regarded as the opposite orders of verb and object. In linguistic typology research, Chinese is an SVO type language while Korean is an SOV type language. It is true that Korean always confuse the order of verb and object at the beginning of learning the Chinese language. But this ordering problem is not the most one when the level gets up. The position of adverb becomes a more common problem to the Korean learners. The aim of this article is to find out the reason for the adverb position error of Korean learners which is related to their native language. A strong relationship between adverb position error and negative transfer has been reported in the prior studies. But most of them are not enough for explaining the reason for the adverb position error. Because the prior contrast studies have only focused on comparing two languages, while the prior error studies paid much attention to the negative transfer. Both of them can not deal with the word order error. This study set out to determine the adverb order of Chinese language and Korean language, then based on the comparison of them, to analyze the reason for the errors. According to the result, a more optimized solution to the order problem of adverb would take happen by improving the teaching and teaching materials. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 25 | - |
| dc.language | 중국어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | CHI | - |
| dc.publisher | 중국어문연구회 | - |
| dc.title | 基于中韩副词种类及句法位置对比的语序偏误探讨 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | An Error Analysis of Chinese Adverb Order ― Based on Comparative Study of the Adverb Description and Syntactic Position of Chinese and Korean Languages | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.26586/chls.2019..92.002 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 중국어문논총, no.92, pp 33 - 57 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 중국어문논총 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 92 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 33 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 57 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART002459346 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | SLA | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | adverb | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | word order | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | error analysis | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | language transfer | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea+82-2-2260-3114
Copyright(c) 2023 DONGGUK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
