Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

형사절차에 관한 2018년 헌법재판소의 주요 결정에 관한 검토

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author강동욱-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-28T03:40:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-28T03:40:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-
dc.identifier.issn1226-8062-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/7786-
dc.description.abstractSince its establishment in September 1988, the Constitutional Court has sought to develop the current law and reform the national system or policies through unconstitutional rulings on the provisions of the current law, which infringes on individuals' basic rights as an institution that embodies the ideology and values of the Constitution. Furthermore, the Constitutional Court has helped ensure the due process and create a human rights-friendly criminal procedure through decisions regarding criminal procedures. Therefore, it would be significant for the Constitutional Court to examine the impact of the decision on criminal proceedings through a review of the Constitutional Court's decision on criminal procedures. In this paper, the main decisions related to criminal proceedings are reviewed during the Constitutional Court's decision in 2018 in an extension that has studied the Constitutional Court's decisions on criminal procedures since the Constitutional Court was established. A total of 13 decisions were made by the Constitutional Court in connection with the 2018 criminal procedure, of which the remaining four were analyzed and reviewed, except for eight decisions on the suspension of prosecution and one on the non-prosecution disposition.-
dc.format.extent26-
dc.language한국어-
dc.language.isoKOR-
dc.publisher한양법학회-
dc.title형사절차에 관한 2018년 헌법재판소의 주요 결정에 관한 검토-
dc.title.alternativeA REVIEW OF MAJOR DECISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RELATED TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURES MADE IN 2018-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation한양법학, v.30, no.3, pp 1 - 26-
dc.citation.title한양법학-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage26-
dc.identifier.kciidART002499195-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor헌법재판소-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor위헌제청신청절차-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor영장주의의 예외-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor즉시항고의 제기기간-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor상고이유-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorthe Constitutional Court-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorapplication procedure for unconstitutional application-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorexception of warrant requirement principle-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorperiod for filing of an immediate appeal-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreason for appeal-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Law > Department of Law > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE