Detailed Information

Cited 24 time in webofscience Cited 31 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Standardization of measurement of cervical elastography, its reproducibility, and analysis of baseline clinical factors affecting elastographic parametersopen access

Authors
Seol, H.-J.Sung, J.-H.Seong, W.J.Kim, H.M.Park, H.S.Kwon, H.Hwang, H.-S.Jung, Y.J.Kwon, J.-Y.Oh, S.-Y.
Issue Date
Jan-2020
Publisher
Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Keywords
Cervix uteri; Elastography; Premature birth; Reproducibility of results; Standardization
Citation
Obstetrics and Gynecology Science, v.63, no.1, pp 42 - 54
Pages
13
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Obstetrics and Gynecology Science
Volume
63
Number
1
Start Page
42
End Page
54
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/7089
DOI
10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.42
ISSN
2287-8572
2287-8580
Abstract
Objective To provide a standardized protocol for the measurement of cervical strain elastography, present its reproducibility, and analyze baseline clinical factors affecting the measurement of elastographic parameters. Methods This study was performed by the Korean Research Group of Cervical Elastography. We enrolled pregnant women according to our study protocol. After measuring the cervical length, elastography was performed using the E-CervixTM quantification tool to measure the strain of the cervix using intrinsic compression. We evaluated 5 elastographic parameters, namely, the strain of the internal os of the cervix (IOS), strain of the external os of the cervix (EOS), ratio of the strain of IOS and EOS, elasticity contrast index, and hardness ratio. For baseline clinical factors, we examined the maternal body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate, uterine artery Doppler indices, and fetal presentation. Results We established a specific protocol for the measurement of cervical elastography using the E cervix program. For all elastographic parameters, the intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.633 to 0.723 for single measures and from 0.838 to 0.887 for average measures, and the inter-observer ICC ranged from 0.814 to 0.977 for single measures and from 0.901 to 0.988 for average measures. Regression analysis showed that the measurement of the elastographic parameter was not affected by baseline clinical factors. Conclusion We present a standardized protocol for the measurement of cervical elastography using intrinsic compression. According to this protocol, reproducibility was acceptable and the measurement of elastographic parameters was not affected by the baseline clinical factors studied. © 2020 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE