Cited 7 time in
Automation of Harboe method for the measurement of plasma free hemoglobin
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chung, Hee-Jung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Chung, Jae-Woo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi, Joowon | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hur, Mina | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Tae Hwan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Hwang, Sang-Hyun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Song, Yoon Kyung | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Do Hoon | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-27T23:40:30Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-04-27T23:40:30Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0887-8013 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1098-2825 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/6585 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background Although plasma free hemoglobin (fHb) test is important for assessing intravascular hemolysis, it is still dependent on the gold standard Harboe method using manual and labor-intensive spectrometric measurements at the wavelength of 380-415-450 nm. We established an automated fHb assay using a routine chemistry autoanalyzer that can be tuned to a wavelength of 380-416-450 nm. Methods The linearity, precision, accuracy, correlation, and sample carryover of fHb measurement using TBA200FRneo method and manual Harboe method were evaluated, respectively. fHb values measured by manual Harboe method were compared with those measured by our new automated TBA200FRneo method. Results fHb measurements were linear in the range of 0.05~38.75 mu mol/L by TBA200FRneo and 0.05~9.69 mu mol/L by manual Harboe method. Imprecision analysis (%CV) revealed 0.9~2.8% for TBA200FRneo method and 5.3~13.6% for the manual Harboe method. Comparison analysis showed 0.9986 of correlation coefficient (TBA200FRneo = 0.970 x Harboe + 0.12). In analytical accuracy analysis, the manual Harboe method revealed about 4 times higher average total error % (12.2%) than the TBA200FRneo automated method (2.8%). The sample carryover was -0.0016% in TBA200FRneo method and 0.0038% in Harboe method. Conclusions In the measurement of fHb, the automated TBA200FRneo method showed better performance than the conventional Harboe method. It is expected that the automated fHb assay using the routine chemistry analyzer can replace the gold standard Harboe method which is labor-intensive and need an independent spectrophotometry equipment. | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | WILEY | - |
| dc.title | Automation of Harboe method for the measurement of plasma free hemoglobin | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jcla.23242 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85081279922 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000544640700041 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, v.34, no.6 | - |
| dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 34 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | Y | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Medical Laboratory Technology | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Medical Laboratory Technology | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SPECTROPHOTOMETRY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SERUM | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | automated chemistry analyzer | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | free hemoglobin | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Harboe method | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | plasma hemoglobin | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | spectrophotometer | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea+82-2-2260-3114
Copyright(c) 2023 DONGGUK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
