Detailed Information

Cited 2 time in webofscience Cited 5 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Effect of the Contents in Advance Directives on Individuals' Decision-Making

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Jae Yoon-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Chi-Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorPuurveen, Gloria-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Do Yeun-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae Hang-
dc.contributor.authorDo, Han Ho-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Kyung Soo-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Kyung Don-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyo Jin-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Yunmi-
dc.contributor.authorShin, Sung Joon-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T22:40:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T22:40:42Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-
dc.identifier.issn0030-2228-
dc.identifier.issn1541-3764-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/6405-
dc.description.abstractCompleting an advance directive offers individuals the opportunity to make informed choices about end-of-life care. However, these decisions could be influenced in different ways depending on how the information is presented. We randomly presented 185 participants with four distinct types of advance directive: neutrally framed (as reference), negatively framed, religiously framed, and a combination. Participants were asked which interventions they would like to receive at the end of life. Between 60% and 70% of participants responded "accept the special interventions" on the reference form. However, the majority (70%-90%) chose "refuse the interventions" on the negative form. With respect to the religious form, 70% to 80% chose "not decided yet." Participants who refused special life-sustaining treatments were older, female, and with better prior knowledge about advance directives. Our findings imply that the specific content of advance directives could affect decision-making with regard to various interventions for end-of-life care.-
dc.format.extent18-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.titleEffect of the Contents in Advance Directives on Individuals' Decision-Making-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0030222818782344-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85048870909-
dc.identifier.wosid000545102500006-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationOMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING, v.81, no.3, pp 436 - 453-
dc.citation.titleOMEGA-JOURNAL OF DEATH AND DYING-
dc.citation.volume81-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage436-
dc.citation.endPage453-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPsychology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBiomedical Social Sciences-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychology, Multidisciplinary-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySocial Sciences, Biomedical-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCARE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoradvance directives-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordecision-making-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorend-of-life care-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorinformed decision-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorframing effect-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Do, Han Ho photo

Do, Han Ho
Graduate School (Department of Medicine)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE