Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Deep Learning Model for Analyzing EEG Signal Analysis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Varun-
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Vivek-
dc.contributor.authorPrince-
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Saurabh-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Young-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorRa, In-Ho-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T02:30:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-13T02:30:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536-
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/58296-
dc.description.abstractTo analyze the physiological information within the acquired EEG signal is very cumbersome due to the possibility of several factors, viz. noise and artifacts, complexity of brain dynamics, and inter-subject variability. To address these issues, this paper compares a U-shaped encoder-decoder network (UNET) and Bat-based UNET signal analysis (BUSA) techniques to classify depression rates in the Electroencephalogram (EEG) datasets. The main objective of including these two techniques is to reveal their effectiveness. It comprises pre-processing, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification stages. The framework excels at noise reduction during pre-processing, enhancing dataset integrity. Feature extraction leverages band power and correlation dimension to extract crucial features. Furthermore, feature selection optimizes classification accuracy by refining the fitness function of bats in the classification layer. The performance of UNET and BUSA are compared based on the following performance evaluating parameters viz. accuracy (Acc), Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision (P), and recall (R) (or sensitivity (Se)). The results indicated that the BUSA technique outperforms the UNET technique. © 2013 IEEE.-
dc.format.extent12-
dc.language영어-
dc.language.isoENG-
dc.publisherIEEE-
dc.titleDeep Learning Model for Analyzing EEG Signal Analysis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location미국-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3563760-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105003478658-
dc.identifier.wosid001499536700014-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationIEEE Access, v.13, pp 91034 - 91045-
dc.citation.titleIEEE Access-
dc.citation.volume13-
dc.citation.startPage91034-
dc.citation.endPage91045-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessY-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaComputer Science-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaEngineering-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaTelecommunications-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryComputer Science, Information Systems-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEngineering, Electrical & Electronic-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryTelecommunications-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBand Power-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBat-based UNET signal analysis (BUSA)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcorrelation dimension-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEEG datasets-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorU-shaped encoder-decoder network (UNET)-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher , Prince photo

, Prince
College of Engineering (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE