Comparative Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin in Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment

Abstract

Background Research specifically addressing the efficacy of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with ischemic stroke is insufficient. Using a large stroke registry, we investigated whether 2 commonly used statins, rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, differ in their effectiveness in reducing the risk of vascular events in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Methods We analyzed data from a nationwide stroke registry in South Korea between January 2011 and April 2022. Patients with acute ischemic stroke within 7 days of onset who were prescribed either atorvastatin or rosuvastatin at discharge were included. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent stroke (either hemorrhagic or ischemic), myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within 1 year.Results A total of 43 512 patients (age, 69.2 +/- 12.5 years; male, 59.8%) were analyzed in this study. Atorvastatin was used in 84.8% (n=36 903), and rosuvastatin was used in 15.2% (n=6609). The 1-year cumulative event rate of the composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the rosuvastatin group than in the atorvastatin group (9.7% [95% CI, 9.0-10.5] versus 10.7% [95% CI, 10.4-11.0]; P=0.049). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that rosuvastatin, compared with atorvastatin, was significantly associated with less risk of 1-year composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, with an absolute risk reduction of 1% [95% CI, -1.8 to -0.2] and a relative risk reduction of 11% (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.97]). However, there were discrepancies in the statistical significance of the results between the propensity score matching and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.Conclusions The results of this analysis of a large cohort of patients with ischemic stroke suggested that, compared with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin was significantly associated with a reduced risk of a 1-year composite of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, in real clinical practice, rosuvastatin is used less than one-fifth as frequently as atorvastatin in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study serves as a hypothesis-generating function.