Detailed Information

Cited 1 time in webofscience Cited 1 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Outcomes of Single Suture Mueller's Muscle Conjunctival Resection: Ethnic Considerations

Authors
Gur, ZviChang, MinwookLiu, Catherine Y.Korn, Bobby S.Kikkawa, Don O.
Issue Date
Jan-2022
Publisher
The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
Keywords
Adult; Aged; Anatomy; Article; Asian; Caucasian; Clinical Outcome; Controlled Study; Digital Imaging; Ethnicity; Eye Surgery; Female; Human; Incidence; Inheritance; Major Clinical Study; Male; Medical Record Review; Middle Aged; Mueller Muscle Conjunctival Resection; Ptosis (eyelid); Retrospective Study; Extraocular Muscle; Eyelid; Eyelid Reconstruction; Suture; Blepharoplasty; Blepharoptosis; Ethnicity; Eyelids; Humans; Middle Aged; Oculomotor Muscles; Retrospective Studies; Sutures
Citation
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, v.38, no.1, pp 50 - 52
Pages
3
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume
38
Number
1
Start Page
50
End Page
52
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/3772
DOI
10.1097/IOP.0000000000001980
ISSN
0740-9303
1537-2677
Abstract
Purpose: To compare outcomes of Mueller's Muscle Conjunctival Resection (MMCR) between 2 groups of patients with different anatomy due to ethnic heritage. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent MMCR between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent additional procedures, such as upper blepharoplasty and browplasty, were excluded from the study. Patients were divided in 2 groups based on self-identified ethnic groups (Asian and Caucasian). Image J software was used to calculate MRD1 from digital images. The improvement of MRD1 (net MRD1) after surgery was evaluated and compared between 2 groups. Results: Eighty-three eyes of 68 patients were included in this study. The Asian group consisted of 41 eyelids from 28 patients. The Caucasian group consisted of 42 eyelids from 40 patients. The average age was 52.18 (SD 20.176) in the Asian group compared with the 66.45 years (SD 9.22, p < 0.005) in the Caucasian group. The mean improvement of MRD1 was 1.96 +/- 0.75 mm in Asian group and 2.05 +/- 0.72 mm in Caucasian group, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). The incidence of ptosis overcorrection and undercorrection between the groups was also not statistically significant. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the surgical outcomes among the 2 study groups. Despite differences in the anatomy of Caucasian and Asian eyelids, MMCR is a successful procedure in patients self-identified from both ethnic groups.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE