The association between atlantoaxial instability and anomalies of vertebral artery and axis

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: A screw-rod system is the most widely used technique for atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, neglecting anomalies of the vertebral artery and axis could lead to fatal complications. Whether or not the presence of AAI is associated with a more complicated anatomy for instrumentation is unclear. PURPOSE: To analyze the association between AAI and anomalies of the vertebral artery and axis in patients with and without AAI. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred and twenty patients who underwent preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography with vertebral angiography of the cervical spine at our institution from 2012 to 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: The C2 isthmus height, internal height of the C2 lateral mass, and C2 pedicle width were radiologically assessed. METHODS: A case control study with matched cohort analysis was conducted. One hundred and twenty patients were divided into 2 groups according to presence of AAI, and the presence of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) and a narrow pedicle for insertion of the C2 pedicle screw was assessed, as was the prevalence of extraosseous vertebral artery anomaly. RESULTS: The C2 isthmus height, C2 internal height, and C2 pedicle width were significantly narrower in the AAI group (p<.01, <.01, and <.01, respectively). A significantly greater proportion of patients with AAI had HRVA and a narrow pedicle than those without (p<.01 and < 0.01, respectively). Among patients with AAI, the C2 internal height was significantly narrower in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p<.01). Five patients (8.3%) with AAI had vertebral artery anomaly (3 fenestration, 2 persistent first intersegmental artery), while there were no vertebral artery anomalies in patients without AAI (p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral artery anomalies are more common in patients with AAI. Furthermore, posterior instrumentation in patients with AAI has a narrower safe zone compared to that in patients without AAI, which may be caused by a long-lasting deformity rather than a congenital deformity. Therefore, more thorough preoperative evaluation of the anatomy should be performed in these patients. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.