Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 4 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Feasibility of Temporary Pancreatic Stenting after Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitisopen accessFeasibility of Temporary Pancreatic Stenting after Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis

Other Titles
Feasibility of Temporary Pancreatic Stenting after Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
Authors
Lee, J.K.Jang, D.K.Kang, H.W.Lee, S.H.
Issue Date
25-Nov-2017
Publisher
대한소화기학회
Keywords
Acute biliary pancreatitis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Pancreatic stenting
Citation
The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, v.70, no.5, pp 247 - 252
Pages
6
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi
Volume
70
Number
5
Start Page
247
End Page
252
URI
https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/25196
DOI
10.4166/kjg.2017.70.5.247
ISSN
1598-9992
2233-6869
Abstract
Background/Aims: To assess the safety and effectiveness of temporary pancreatic stenting after early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis regardless of the severity or concomitant cholangitis.Methods: Temporary pancreatic stenting was performed in 79 patients with visualized pancreatic duct during ERCP. The outcomes of 64 patients with adequate pancreatic stenting (PS) and 15 patients with inadequate pancreatic stenting (no PS) were compared in this prospective, observational trial.Results: The baseline characteristics were similar. Development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (7.8% for PS vs. 13.3% for no PS; p=0.50) and mortality (none for both groups; p=0.99) did not differ. However, fewer local complications occurred in PS than in no PS (4.7% for PS vs. 20.0% for no PS; p=0.04) and the difference was most outstanding in necrosis (1.6% for PS vs. 13.3% for no PS; p=0.03).Conclusions: Temporary pancreatic stenting after early ERCP should be considered safe, as complications did not increase even in cases of inadequate stenting. However, if successful, there appears to be a reduction in local complications.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE