Deep Learning-Based Automatic Classification of Ischemic Stroke Subtype Using Diffusion-Weighted Imagesopen access
- Authors
- Wi-Sun Ryu; Dawid Schellingerhout; Hoyoun Lee; Keon-Joo Lee; Chi Kyung Kim; Beom Joon Kim; Jong-Won Chung; Jae-Sung Lim; Joon-Tae Kim; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae-Kwan Cha; Leonard Sunwoo; Dongmin Kim; Sang-Il Suh; Oh Young Bang; Hee-Joon Bae; Dong-Eog Kim
- Issue Date
- May-2024
- Publisher
- 대한뇌졸중학회
- Keywords
- Deep learning; Artificial intelligence; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Atrial fibrillation; Ischemic stroke
- Citation
- 대한뇌졸중영문학회지, v.26, no.2, pp 300 - 311
- Pages
- 12
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
KCI
- Journal Title
- 대한뇌졸중영문학회지
- Volume
- 26
- Number
- 2
- Start Page
- 300
- End Page
- 311
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/22167
- DOI
- 10.5853/jos.2024.00535
- ISSN
- 2287-6391
2287-6405
- Abstract
- Background and Purpose Accurate classification of ischemic stroke subtype is important for effective secondary prevention of stroke. We used diffusion-weighted image (DWI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) data to train a deep learning algorithm to classify stroke subtype.
Methods Model development was done in 2,988 patients with ischemic stroke from three centers by using U-net for infarct segmentation and EfficientNetV2 for subtype classification. Experienced neurologists (n=5) determined subtypes for external test datasets, while establishing a consensus for clinical trial datasets. Automatically segmented infarcts were fed into the model (DWI-only algorithm). Subsequently, another model was trained, with AF included as a categorical variable (DWI+AF algorithm). These models were tested: (1) internally against the opinion of the labeling experts, (2) against fresh external DWI data, and (3) against clinical trial dataset.
Results In the training-and-validation datasets, the mean (±standard deviation) age was 68.0±12.5 (61.1% male). In internal testing, compared with the experts, the DWI-only and the DWI+AF algorithms respectively achieved moderate (65.3%) and near-strong (79.1%) agreement. In external testing, both algorithms again showed good agreements (59.3%–60.7% and 73.7%–74.0%, respectively). In the clinical trial dataset, compared with the expert consensus, percentage agreements and Cohen’s kappa were respectively 58.1% and 0.34 for the DWI-only vs. 72.9% and 0.57 for the DWI+AF algorithms. The corresponding values between experts were comparable (76.0% and 0.61) to the DWI+AF algorithm.
Conclusion Our model trained on a large dataset of DWI (both with or without AF information) was able to classify ischemic stroke subtypes comparable to a consensus of stroke experts.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Graduate School > Department of Medicine > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.