공급망 ESG 관리에서 예상되는 분쟁 중재에 관한 연구 - 포스코와 네이버 사례를 중심으로 -A Study on Expected Dispute Arbitration in Supply Chain ESG Management: Focusing on the cases of POSCO and NAVER
- Other Titles
- A Study on Expected Dispute Arbitration in Supply Chain ESG Management: Focusing on the cases of POSCO and NAVER
- Authors
- 이건우; 이정은; 이훈종
- Issue Date
- Mar-2024
- Publisher
- 한국중재학회
- Keywords
- ESG; Supply Chain; Commercial Arbitration; Standard Contract; Professional Arbitrator; ESG; 공급망; 상사중재; 표준계약서; 전문중재인
- Citation
- 중재연구, v.34, no.1, pp 75 - 101
- Pages
- 27
- Indexed
- KCI
- Journal Title
- 중재연구
- Volume
- 34
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 75
- End Page
- 101
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/21565
- DOI
- 10.16998/jas.2024.34.1.75
- ISSN
- 1226-3699
- Abstract
- "ESG management" guides companies to prioritize corporate social responsibility and sustainable development as key management objectives, going beyond mere financial performance pursuits. This approach involves creating a sustainable and robust supply chain by urging companies, acting as 'supply chain managers', to implement ESG management practices alongside their 'supply chain partners'. The domestic business community has been quick to respond to this trend, recognizing that failure to adhere to ESG standards set by organizations such as the EU and SEC could lead to severe repercussions, including exclusion from international trade and reputational damage.
POSCO and NAVER, two leading Korean companies, are at the forefront of practicing ESG management effectively. They have both produced and publicly disclosed ESG management reports, showcasing their success in enhancing supply chain ESG management. However, as supply chain managers enforce ESG-related obligations on their suppliers, the likelihood of disputes between the parties may increase.
In scenarios where supply chain ESG management leads to conflicts between supply chain managers and suppliers, commercial arbitration emerges as a viable solution for dispute resolution. This method offers several advantages, including the arbitrators' expertise, time and cost efficiency, the binding nature of decisions akin to a court's final judgment, international recognition under the New York Convention, confidentiality, and ample opportunity for parties to be heard.
Our analysis focuses on the emerging disputes between supply chain managers and suppliers within the context of supply chain ESG management, particularly examining the cases of POSCO and NAVER. By categorizing the expected types of disputes and assessing the appropriateness of commercial arbitration for their resolution, we highlight the effectiveness of this approach. Furthermore, we propose leveraging the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board's role to enhance the use of arbitration in resolving supply chain ESG disputes, underscoring its potential as a strategic tool for maintaining sustainable and harmonious supply chain relationships.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Law > Department of Law > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.