Comparative study of lipid nanoparticle-based mRNA vaccine bioprocess with machine learning and combinatorial artificial neural network-design of experiment approachopen access
- Authors
- Maharjan, Ravi; Hada, Shavron; Lee, Ji Eun; Han, Hyo-Kyung; Kim, Ki Hyun; Seo, Hye Jin; Foged, Camilla; Jeong, Seong Hoon
- Issue Date
- Jun-2023
- Publisher
- ELSEVIER
- Keywords
- Artificial-neural-network design-of-experiment; Lipid nanoparticle (LNP); Machine learning; Messenger RNA; Support vector machines; XGBoost
- Citation
- International Journal of Pharmaceutics, v.640, pp 1 - 13
- Pages
- 13
- Indexed
- SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Pharmaceutics
- Volume
- 640
- Start Page
- 1
- End Page
- 13
- URI
- https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/21198
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123012
- ISSN
- 0378-5173
1873-3476
- Abstract
- To develop a combinatorial artificial-neural-network design-of-experiment (ANN-DOE) model, the effect of ionizable lipid, an ionizable lipid-to-cholesterol ratio, N/P ratio, flow rate ratio (FRR), and total flow rate (TFR) on the outcome responses of mRNA-LNP vaccine were evaluated using a definitive screening design (DSD) and machine learning (ML) algorithms. Particle size (PS), PDI, zeta potential (ZP), and encapsulation efficiency (EE) of mRNA-LNP were optimized within a defined constraint (PS 40-100 nm, PDI <= 0.30, ZP >=(+/-)0.30 mV, EE >= 70 %), fed to ML algorithms (XGBoost, bootstrap forest, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, generalized regression-Lasso, ANN) and prediction was compared to ANN-DOE model. Increased FRR decreased the PS and increased ZP, while increased TFR increased PDI and ZP. Similarly, DOTAP and DOTMA produced higher ZP and EE. Particularly, a cationic ionizable lipid with an N/P ratio >= 6 provided a higher EE. ANN showed better predictive ability (R2 = 0.7269-0.9946), while XGBoost demonstrated better RASE (0.2833-2.9817). The ANN -DOE model outperformed both optimized ML models by R2 = 1.21 % and RASE = 43.51 % (PS prediction), R2 = 0.23 % and RASE = 3.47 % (PDI prediction), R2 = 5.73 % and RASE = 27.95 % (ZP prediction), and R2 = 0.87 % and RASE = 36.95 % (EE prediction), respectively, which demonstrated that ANN-DOE model was superior in predicting the bioprocess compared to independent models.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Pharmacy > Department of Pharmacy > 1. Journal Articles

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.