Cited 0 time in
Validation of RSDA Model in Moral Decision-Making of Artificial Moral Agent or AI Robots
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | 김종욱 | - |
| dc.contributor.author | 신나민 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-08T09:00:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-08T09:00:31Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1975-7700 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2734-0570 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/20717 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this research is to validate the RSDA model for forecasting decision-making processes in Artificial Moral Agents (AMAs) or AI Robots. The RSDA model delineates the Rubric evaluation, Scenario development, and Data collection phases, ultimately culminating in the creation of an Algorithm capable of predicting robot or AI responses that closely align with human decision-making. This investigation demonstrates the feasibility of a hybrid AMA model that can emulate human ethical judgment by discerning ethical scores through the analysis of human decision-making patterns in real-life scenarios. Data for this study were gathered from a cohort of elementary and college students who responded to four ethical dilemma scenarios involving domestic, medical, and educational robots, as well as autonomous vehicles. The Univariate Dynamic Encoding Algorithm for Searches (uDEAS) was subsequently employed to construct a statistical model that conforms to the decision-making patterns observed in human groups under consideration. According to the results of the RSDA model, the absolute mean ethics score for ethical principle 1 is 0.49 for elementary school students and 1.53 for university students, indicating that ethical awareness of human rights develops as students grow older. In addition, the average standard deviation of the ethics scores of the five principles is 1.02 for elementary school students and 0.67 for college students, indicating that ethical judgment narrows with age and ethical consensus is formed. The findings of this study affirm that the RSDA model, while intuitive, systematically elucidates each step and holds substantial promise for deployment in scenarios wherein intelligent agents necessitate human-like decision-making capabilities. Moreover, the RSDA model is anticipated to enhance the credibility of AMAs by augmenting the transparency and explainability of decisions made by social robots or AI. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 11 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | 한국지식정보기술학회 | - |
| dc.title | Validation of RSDA Model in Moral Decision-Making of Artificial Moral Agent or AI Robots | - |
| dc.title.alternative | 인공 윤리 에이전트 또는 AI 로봇의 윤리적 의사 결정에 대한 RSDA 모델 타당화 | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.34163/jkits.2023.18.6.013 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지, v.18, no.6, pp 1535 - 1545 | - |
| dc.citation.title | 한국지식정보기술학회 논문지 | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 1535 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 1545 | - |
| dc.identifier.kciid | ART003032822 | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Artificial moral agent | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Robot ethics | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | AI ethics | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | RSDA model | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Optimization method | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea+82-2-2260-3114
Copyright(c) 2023 DONGGUK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
