Cited 10 time in
Gastric Distension With SLIPA Versus LMA ProSeal During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Trial
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Cha, Su Man | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Park, Sihyun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kang, Hyun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Baek, Chong Wha | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Jung, Yong Hun | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Cha, Young Joo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | In, Junyong | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-08T05:01:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-08T05:01:08Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1530-4515 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1534-4908 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/18306 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Background:We compared the quantitative clinical performances of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) regarding intensity of gastric distension in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods:A total of 124 anesthetized, paralyzed patients (ASA 1 to 2; aged, 18 to 80 y) were randomly allocated for airway management with the SLIPA or LMA ProSeal. After induction of general anesthesia using total intravenous anesthesia and rocuronium, the intensity of gastric distension was accessed twice by 2 raters, respectively. We also compared the fiberoptic bronchoscopic view of the glottis, the severity of blood stain, and postoperative sore throat. Results:There were no statistically significant differences between groups for each gastric size. The change of gastric size within the SLIPA group was not statistically significant for both raters. Change within the LMA ProSeal group was significant in rater 2 (P=0.045) and marginally significant for rater 1 (P=0.056). Anatomic fit, complications during emergence, and the severity of blood stain and postoperative sore throat were similar in both groups. Conclusions:SLIPA is as efficacious as LMA ProSeal for use in patients without severe complications who are undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. | - |
| dc.format.extent | 5 | - |
| dc.language | 영어 | - |
| dc.language.iso | ENG | - |
| dc.publisher | LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS | - |
| dc.title | Gastric Distension With SLIPA Versus LMA ProSeal During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Trial | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.publisher.location | 미국 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182905bb6 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84902255647 | - |
| dc.identifier.wosid | 000337501300015 | - |
| dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, v.24, no.3, pp 216 - 220 | - |
| dc.citation.title | SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES | - |
| dc.citation.volume | 24 | - |
| dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
| dc.citation.startPage | 216 | - |
| dc.citation.endPage | 220 | - |
| dc.type.docType | Article | - |
| dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | sci | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
| dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
| dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
| dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | POSITIVE-PRESSURE VENTILATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | PHARYNX AIRWAY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | STREAMLINED LINER | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRACHEAL INTUBATION | - |
| dc.subject.keywordPlus | SURGERY | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | gastric distension | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | laparoscopic cholecystectomy | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | laryngeal mask airway | - |
| dc.subject.keywordAuthor | SLIPA | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
30, Pildong-ro 1-gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04620, Republic of Korea+82-2-2260-3114
Copyright(c) 2023 DONGGUK UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.
