Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

中韩标点符号对比

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author유준방-
dc.contributor.author한용수-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T02:30:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-08T02:30:43Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.issn1229-3458-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.dongguk.edu/handle/sw.dongguk/16203-
dc.description.abstractBased on the 本文基于标点符号在外语教学中不受重视的现实情况,回顾了中韩标点符号的发展历史,并根据两国最新的标准≪标点符号用法≫和≪한글맞춤법≫,将中韩标点符号分成形式相同的、形式不同的和无对应形式的三类,进行了对比分析。通过对比,我们发现,无论是形式相同的或是形式不同的中韩标点符号之间都存在着或大或小的差异,有的是功能上的差异,有的是用法上的差异,还有的是书写格式及与其他符号连用的差异。可见,在作为第二语言习得的汉语或韩语的学习及教学过程中,都不能忽视标点符号的差异,若直接将母语中标点符号的使用习惯移植到外语中,容易产生偏误。我们还针对无对应形式的中韩标点符号,以及形式相同而功能有区别的标点符号,提出了可行的替换方案。希望以此为作为第二语言习得的汉语或韩语的学习及教学、中韩翻译,提供明确且实用的标点符号参照标准。-
dc.format.extent26-
dc.language중국어-
dc.language.isoCHI-
dc.publisher중국학연구회-
dc.title中韩标点符号对比-
dc.title.alternativeA Contrastive Research on Punctuation of Chinese and Korean-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.location대한민국-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation중국학연구, no.74, pp 119 - 144-
dc.citation.title중국학연구-
dc.citation.number74-
dc.citation.startPage119-
dc.citation.endPage144-
dc.identifier.kciidART002053750-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpunctuation of Chinese and Korean-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorforms of punctuation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfunction of punctuation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorusage error-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor中韩标点符号-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor标点符号格式-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor标点符号功能-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor使用偏误-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Humanities > Department of Chinese Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE